State Of Maharashtra vs Baban Namdave Salve Advocate - Adv. M.K.Undal — 1200014/2006
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,34. Disposed: Contested--DISCHARGED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS080000542006
Filing Number
1210014/2006
Filing Date
02-02-2006
Registration No
1200014/2006
Registration Date
02-02-2006
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISCHARGED
FIR Details
FIR Number
121
Police Station
P. S. Shirpur
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Baban Namdave Salve Advocate - Adv. M.K.Undal
Suresh Amourta Habre
Adv. Adv. M.K. Undal
Hearing History
Judge: 7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 29-12-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Baban Namdave Salve & Suresh Amourta Habre (1200014/2006) The court acquitted both accused of cattle theft charges under IPC Section 379/34. The complainant alleged his buffalo was stolen on 11.12.2005 from village Koyali, suspecting the two accused. However, the court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the crime—the complainant's testimony merely stated his buffalo was stolen by unknown persons, without specifically identifying either accused as the perpetrator. The judgment, delivered on 16.03.2026 after 20 years, ruled the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and discharged both accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Baban Namdave Salve & Suresh Amourta Habre (1200014/2006) The court acquitted both accused of cattle theft charges under IPC Section 379/34. The complainant alleged his buffalo was stolen on 11.12.2005 from village Koyali, suspecting the two accused. However, the court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the crime—the complainant's testimony merely stated his buffalo was stolen by unknown persons, without specifically identifying either accused as the perpetrator. The judgment, delivered on 16.03.2026 after 20 years, ruled the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and discharged both accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts