Rameshwar Wamanrao Taide vs Latish Ghanshyamdas Khemwani Advocate - RATHOD DILIP UKANDRAO — 6/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 16th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS070001352017
Filing Number
9/2017
Filing Date
18-01-2017
Registration No
6/2017
Registration Date
18-01-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rameshwar Wamanrao Taide
Adv. Bakhade Sachin Govindrao
Respondent(s)
Latish Ghanshyamdas Khemwani Advocate - RATHOD DILIP UKANDRAO
Kavita Satish Narharshettwar
Satish Vilasrao Narharshettwar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 29-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 15-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 18-12-2025 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: RCS No. 6/2017 (Rameshwar v. Latish Khemwani) The court allowed Defendant No. 5's application to file her written statement late, setting aside the June 8, 2023 no-written-statement order. The judge found substance in her claims of illness and lack of access to documents due to her husband's Army service, and noted she was added to the suit later by court order. To compensate for the delay caused to the plaintiff, the court imposed Rs. 1,000 costs as a condition before accepting her written statement on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: RCS No. 6/2017 (Rameshwar v. Latish Khemwani) The court allowed Defendant No. 5's application to file her written statement late, setting aside the June 8, 2023 no-written-statement order. The judge found substance in her claims of illness and lack of access to documents due to her husband's Army service, and noted she was added to the suit later by court order. To compensate for the delay caused to the plaintiff, the court imposed Rs. 1,000 costs as a condition before accepting her written statement on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts