Vishwas Sheshrao Tayde vs Shri Gajanan Maharaj Prasarak Mandal Babhulgaon Through Secretary shri Sham Tulshiram Dhoble Advocate - SOMANI AMOL RAMESHCHANDRA — 7/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 21. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
Spl .Dkst - Execution Petition against decree passed in Special Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS020001762024
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2024
Filing Number
180/2024
Filing Date
27-02-2024
Registration No
7/2024
Registration Date
27-02-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishwas Sheshrao Tayde
Adv. BERIYA AJAYKUMAR SHANKARLAL
Respondent(s)
Shri Gajanan Maharaj Prasarak Mandal Babhulgaon Through Secretary shri Sham Tulshiram Dhoble Advocate - SOMANI AMOL RAMESHCHANDRA
Mukhyadhyapak Shri Gajanan Maharaj Vidyalaya Babhulgaon Tq Dist Washim Shri Rameshwar Madhav Gote
Adv. TIFANE VAIBHAV MANIKARV
Shikshanadhikari Madhyamik Zilla Parishad Washim
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Awaiting Notice
Steps
Steps
Awaiting Warrant
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 05-05-2026 | Steps |
| 20-04-2026 | Steps |
| 06-04-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Vishwas Tayde v. Gajanan Maharaj Prasarak Mandal & Others (7/2024) Outcome: The court allowed the objection and dismissed the proceeding against J.D. No.2 (Rameshwar Madhav Gote). The Civil Judge found that J.D. No.2 was not authorized to sign salary bills when the School Tribunal issued its order on 25/08/2023, and had already been transferred to another school by the time the recovery proceeding was initiated. Therefore, he could not be held responsible for executing the tribunal's back wages payment order of Rs. 12,74,750. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Vishwas Tayde v. Gajanan Maharaj Prasarak Mandal & Others (7/2024) Outcome: The court allowed the objection and dismissed the proceeding against J.D. No.2 (Rameshwar Madhav Gote). The Civil Judge found that J.D. No.2 was not authorized to sign salary bills when the School Tribunal issued its order on 25/08/2023, and had already been transferred to another school by the time the recovery proceeding was initiated. Therefore, he could not be held responsible for executing the tribunal's back wages payment order of Rs. 12,74,750. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts