Gopal Narayandas Agrawal vs Lalita wo Rajkumar Agrawal Advocate - Bakliwal Surendra Gorulal — 600046/2009
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforpermanentInjuctionandmandatoryinjuction. Disposed: Contested--DECREED AFTER FULL TRIAL on 08th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS020001462009
Filing Number
600163/2009
Filing Date
16-03-2009
Registration No
600046/2009
Registration Date
17-03-2009
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED AFTER FULL TRIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gopal Narayandas Agrawal
Adv. Deshmukh Uday Achyutrao
Respondent(s)
Lalita wo Rajkumar Agrawal Advocate - Bakliwal Surendra Gorulal
Rajkumar Kashiprasad Agrawal
Taluka Inspector of land record washim
State Of Maharashra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 600046/2009 The court decreed the suit of Gopal Narayandas Agrawal for permanent injunction and dismissed the counter-suit of Lalita. The judge found that Gopal validly became owner of a three-storied commercial property (CTS 381) through an oral partition with his adoptive father Narayandas in January 2002, memorialized in writing in January 2002. The gift deed executed by Narayandas in favor of Lalita in March 2008 was deemed fraudulent and void, obtained when Narayandas was mentally unfit and after the property had already been partitioned to Gopal. Gopal was permanently restrained the defendants from obstructing his possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 600046/2009 The court decreed the suit of Gopal Narayandas Agrawal for permanent injunction and dismissed the counter-suit of Lalita. The judge found that Gopal validly became owner of a three-storied commercial property (CTS 381) through an oral partition with his adoptive father Narayandas in January 2002, memorialized in writing in January 2002. The gift deed executed by Narayandas in favor of Lalita in March 2008 was deemed fraudulent and void, obtained when Narayandas was mentally unfit and after the property had already been partitioned to Gopal. Gopal was permanently restrained the defendants from obstructing his possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts