State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Deoli vs Mukesh alias Gajani Mahadeo Atram 02 Advocate - LADC Adv. Verma D.M. — 72/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),109,352,3(5). Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHWR010020192025

Filing of Surety

Next Hearing

29th May 2026

Filing Number

962/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

72/2025

Registration Date

18-10-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Wardha

Judge

3-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA

FIR Details

FIR Number

450

Police Station

Police Station Deoli

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),109,352,3(5)
Indian Arms Act Section 4,(25)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Thr Police Station, Deoli

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Mukesh alias Gajani Mahadeo Atram 02 Advocate - LADC Adv. Verma D.M.

Santosh Prakash Patmase

Adv. Kashikar U. P.

Mangesh Prakash Patmase

Adv. Kashikar U. P.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DISTRICT JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, WARDHA

30-04-2026

Filing of Surety

28-04-2026

Compliance

22-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

13-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

16-03-2026

Filing of Surety

Interim Orders

28-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Accused Mukesh Mahadeo Atram's application for release on personal bond was allowed. The court released him on a personal recognizance (PR) bond of Rs. 20,000 for one month, during which he must furnish surety of Rs. 20,000 for offenses under BNS Sections 109, 118(1), 352 R/w 3(5) and Indian Arms Act Section 4 R/w 25. He must also comply with previously imposed conditions including providing residence details and contact information. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Accused Mukesh Mahadeo Atram's application for release on personal bond was allowed. The court released him on a personal recognizance (PR) bond of Rs. 20,000 for one month, during which he must furnish surety of Rs. 20,000 for offenses under BNS Sections 109, 118(1), 352 R/w 3(5) and Indian Arms Act Section 4 R/w 25. He must also comply with previously imposed conditions including providing residence details and contact information. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Wardha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case