Gouri Shashikant Kadam Others vs Parshuram Keshav Kadam Others Advocate - Ghadge S. J. — 297/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHST130009502023

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

Filing Number

366/2023

Filing Date

14-07-2023

Registration No

297/2023

Registration Date

14-07-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patan

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Gouri Shashikant Kadam Others

Adv. Jagtap G.B.

Goushik Shashikant Kadam

Respondent(s)

Parshuram Keshav Kadam Others Advocate - Ghadge S. J.

Sushila Parshuram Kadam

Pradip Parshuram Kadam

Shashikant Parshuram Kadam

Avinash Parshuram Kadam

Chhaya Sudam Pawar

Bank of Maharashtra Branch Satara

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Patan

09-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

06-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

27-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

16-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

16-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

10-04-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Case No.: 297/2023 | Court: Civil Court, Patan, Maharashtra | Date: 10.04.2024 The court partially allowed the bank's (Respondent 7) application under the SARFAESI Act 2002 and dismissed the plaintiff's temporary injunction petition. The court held that the bank has full authority to proceed under SARFAESI Act 2002 and that staying the bank's action would not be appropriate. Cost matters reserved for final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: 297/2023 | Court: Civil Court, Patan, Maharashtra | Date: 10.04.2024 The court partially allowed the bank's (Respondent 7) application under the SARFAESI Act 2002 and dismissed the plaintiff's temporary injunction petition. The court held that the bank has full authority to proceed under SARFAESI Act 2002 and that staying the bank's action would not be appropriate. Cost matters reserved for final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case