Sada Subha Kamble (Deceased)(Legal Heir) vs Ajay Bhaga Kambale — 169/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHST080005722023
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
Filing Number
207/2023
Filing Date
04-07-2023
Registration No
169/2023
Registration Date
10-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Khandala
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sada Subha Kamble (Deceased)(Legal Heir)
Adv. D. K. Ankush1.
Shrirang Sada Kamble 1.
Swapnil Shrirang Kamble
Respondent(s)
Ajay Bhaga Kambale
Gramsevak/Sachiv Grampanchayat
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Khandala.
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Issues |
| 20-01-2026 | Issues |
| 02-12-2025 | Issues |
| 07-10-2025 | Issues |
| 03-09-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case No.: R.D.M. 169/2023 | Court: Assistant Judge, Khandala (Satara District) Order Date: 12.11.2024 Outcome: The petition filed by the plaintiff (Smt. Subha Kamble) against the defendant (Ajay Bhaga Kamble) regarding illegal construction on adjoining property (Plot 836-837) is allowed. The court imposed costs of Rs. 200/- on the defendant and directed him to file an affidavit admitting the encroachment. The defendant's unauthorized construction was found to violate the plaintiff's property rights, and orders were passed for appropriate remedial action regarding the disputed boundary demarcation and construction cessation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case No.: R.D.M. 169/2023 | Court: Assistant Judge, Khandala (Satara District) Order Date: 12.11.2024 Outcome: The petition filed by the plaintiff (Smt. Subha Kamble) against the defendant (Ajay Bhaga Kamble) regarding illegal construction on adjoining property (Plot 836-837) is allowed. The court imposed costs of Rs. 200/- on the defendant and directed him to file an affidavit admitting the encroachment. The defendant's unauthorized construction was found to violate the plaintiff's property rights, and orders were passed for appropriate remedial action regarding the disputed boundary demarcation and construction cessation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts