Maharashtra State vs Nanasaheb Baban Bhosale Advocate - Deshmukh Vijay A. — 53/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,409,34. Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHST010007052024
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
340/2024
Filing Date
16-04-2024
Registration No
53/2024
Registration Date
22-04-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court , Satara
Judge
3-District Judge-2 Satara.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Nanasaheb Baban Bhosale Advocate - Deshmukh Vijay A.
Sachin Pralhad Pandit, UTP
Shital Sachin Pandit,UTP
Jeevan Prakash Shirke, Abscond
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-2 Satara.
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 07-02-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 02-02-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: Bail granted with conditions. Accused Nos. 2 (Sachin Pralhad Pandit) and 3 (Shital Sachin Pandit) were ordered released from jail forthwith after the court found their arrests illegal due to non-compliance with Section 47(1) BNSS—specifically, the grounds of arrest were not communicated to them in writing. Though a prima facie case exists for cheating investors of Rs. 15,48,37,413/-, the procedural violation rendered the arrest illegal. They must execute personal recognizance bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties for court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Bail granted with conditions. Accused Nos. 2 (Sachin Pralhad Pandit) and 3 (Shital Sachin Pandit) were ordered released from jail forthwith after the court found their arrests illegal due to non-compliance with Section 47(1) BNSS—specifically, the grounds of arrest were not communicated to them in writing. Though a prima facie case exists for cheating investors of Rs. 15,48,37,413/-, the procedural violation rendered the arrest illegal. They must execute personal recognizance bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties for court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts