Sunil Vitthal Ranjane vs Maharashtra State — 46/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHST010002652026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
86/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Satara
Judge
3-District Judge-2 Satara.
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Vitthal Ranjane
Adv. Mahangade Sagar Pralhad
Respondent(s)
Maharashtra State
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-2 Satara.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Sunil Vitthal Ranjane, an Administrative Officer accused of cheating multiple persons of Rs. 87 lakh by fraudulently promising government job placements. The court held that while issuing notice is the general rule for offences punishable up to 7 years imprisonment under Section 35 BNSS, police may arrest without notice in exceptional cases where conditions under Section 35(1)(b) are satisfied; here, a prima facie case existed warranting potential arrest, making anticipatory bail unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Sunil Vitthal Ranjane, an Administrative Officer accused of cheating multiple persons of Rs. 87 lakh by fraudulently promising government job placements. The court held that while issuing notice is the general rule for offences punishable up to 7 years imprisonment under Section 35 BNSS, police may arrest without notice in exceptional cases where conditions under Section 35(1)(b) are satisfied; here, a prima facie case existed warranting potential arrest, making anticipatory bail unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts