Sandippan Namdev Giramkar vs Maharashtra State — 43/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHST010002402026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

77/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

43/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Satara

Judge

3-District Judge-2 Satara.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),314,316(2),317(4),318(4),323,61(2),115(2),351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Sandippan Namdev Giramkar

Adv. Godase M.S.

Respondent(s)

Maharashtra State

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge-2 Satara.

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Arguments

04-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, dismissed the bail application of Sandippan Namdev Giramkar in a case involving alleged fraud at a sugar mill. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant, a service engineer, provided and inserted an electronic chip into the factory's weighing scale at co-accused's instance to manipulate weight readings, facilitating theft of scrap worth crores. Considering the gravity of the offense, preliminary investigation stage, and evidence tampering risk, the court held bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, dismissed the bail application of Sandippan Namdev Giramkar in a case involving alleged fraud at a sugar mill. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant, a service engineer, provided and inserted an electronic chip into the factory's weighing scale at co-accused's instance to manipulate weight readings, facilitating theft of scrap worth crores. Considering the gravity of the offense, preliminary investigation stage, and evidence tampering risk, the court held bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Satara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case