Suresh Bhagu Kathe vs The President, Aadarsha Shikshan Sanstha Advocate - Niraj Chaughule — 1/2024

Case under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools 1977 Section 9. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Main Appeal

CNR: MHSS120000012024

Filing Number

1/2024

Filing Date

05-Jan-2024

Registration No

1/2024

Registration Date

05-Jan-2024

Court

School Tribunal, Pune

Judge

1-Presiding Officer

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools 1977 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Bhagu Kathe

    Adv. A S Ingle

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The President, Aadarsha Shikshan Sanstha Advocate - Niraj Chaughule

  2. 2.The Secretary, Aadarsha Shikshan Sanstha

  3. 3.The Head Master, Kai.Shri.S.N. Barse Madhyamik Vidyalay

  4. 4.The Education Officer Secondary Zilla Parishad Pune

  5. 5.The Deputy Director of Education, Pune Region, Pune

  6. 6.The Accounting Officer, Zilla parishad, Pune

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The School Tribunal Pune dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging his termination as an Assistant Teacher, finding that his appointment in 2012 was invalid because it violated procedural requirements under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The tribunal held that without proper advertisement, interview, and selection process, the appointment constituted an unlawful "back-door entry" despite the appellant's years of service, and therefore he was not entitled to protection or reinstatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Officer

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Presiding Officer

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Argument

    Presiding Officer

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument

    Presiding Officer

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Argument

    Presiding Officer

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    Argument

    Presiding Officer

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 10-Nov-2025

    Argument

    Presiding Officer

  11. 06-Oct-2025

    Order

    Presiding Officer

  12. 30-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  13. 10-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  14. 13-Aug-2025

    Argument

    Presiding Officer

  15. 24-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  16. 10-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  17. 25-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  18. 22-Apr-2025

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  19. 25-Feb-2025

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  20. 10-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  21. 05-Dec-2024

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  22. 07-Nov-2024

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  23. 08-Oct-2024

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  24. 28-Aug-2024

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  25. 18-Jul-2024

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  26. 18-Jun-2024

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  27. 05-Apr-2024

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  28. 04-Mar-2024

    Reply

    Presiding Officer

  29. 05-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 05-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The School Tribunal Pune dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging his termination as an Assistant Teacher, finding that his appointment in 2012 was invalid because it violated procedural requirements under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. The tribunal held that without proper advertisement, interview, and selection process, the appointment constituted an unlawful "back-door entry" despite the appellant's years of service, and therefore he was not entitled to protection or reinstatement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case