Krushna Namdev Babar vs Nitin Vishwambhar Babar Advocate - Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra — 51/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200002702026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

51/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Krushna Namdev Babar

Adv. Patil G.N.

Respondent(s)

Nitin Vishwambhar Babar Advocate - Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra

Hearing History

Judge: 8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

05-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

08-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

23-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

17-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Case 51/2026 - Krushna Namdev Babar v. Nitin Vishwambhar Babar & Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra The petitioner filed an application seeking correction/amendment of city survey records regarding a residential property. The petitioner alleged that the respondent unlawfully encroached upon his property and constructed a structure, and that city survey records contained errors in the area measurement (showing 57.10 sq.m instead of the correct area). The court found the petitioner's claim credible and that the survey record contained technical errors requiring correction. Order: Petition ALLOWED. The court directed the petitioner to file a corrected version of the case with proper amendments to the records and records with the court file. Both parties were directed to note the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case 51/2026 - Krushna Namdev Babar v. Nitin Vishwambhar Babar & Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra The petitioner filed an application seeking correction/amendment of city survey records regarding a residential property. The petitioner alleged that the respondent unlawfully encroached upon his property and constructed a structure, and that city survey records contained errors in the area measurement (showing 57.10 sq.m instead of the correct area). The court found the petitioner's claim credible and that the survey record contained technical errors requiring correction. Order: Petition ALLOWED. The court directed the petitioner to file a corrected version of the case with proper amendments to the records and records with the court file. Both parties were directed to note the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case