Krushna Namdev Babar vs Nitin Vishwambhar Babar Advocate - Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra — 51/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO200002702026
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
74/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
51/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola
Judge
8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krushna Namdev Babar
Adv. Patil G.N.
Respondent(s)
Nitin Vishwambhar Babar Advocate - Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra
Hearing History
Judge: 8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 08-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case 51/2026 - Krushna Namdev Babar v. Nitin Vishwambhar Babar & Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra The petitioner filed an application seeking correction/amendment of city survey records regarding a residential property. The petitioner alleged that the respondent unlawfully encroached upon his property and constructed a structure, and that city survey records contained errors in the area measurement (showing 57.10 sq.m instead of the correct area). The court found the petitioner's claim credible and that the survey record contained technical errors requiring correction. Order: Petition ALLOWED. The court directed the petitioner to file a corrected version of the case with proper amendments to the records and records with the court file. Both parties were directed to note the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case 51/2026 - Krushna Namdev Babar v. Nitin Vishwambhar Babar & Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra The petitioner filed an application seeking correction/amendment of city survey records regarding a residential property. The petitioner alleged that the respondent unlawfully encroached upon his property and constructed a structure, and that city survey records contained errors in the area measurement (showing 57.10 sq.m instead of the correct area). The court found the petitioner's claim credible and that the survey record contained technical errors requiring correction. Order: Petition ALLOWED. The court directed the petitioner to file a corrected version of the case with proper amendments to the records and records with the court file. Both parties were directed to note the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts