Krushna Namdev Babar vs Nitin Vishwambhar Babar Advocate - Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra — 51/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSO200002702026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

51/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sangola

Judge

8-IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Krushna Namdev Babar

    Adv. Patil G.N.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nitin Vishwambhar Babar Advocate - Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary Case 51/2026 - Krushna Namdev Babar v. Nitin Vishwambhar Babar & Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra The petitioner filed an application seeking correction/amendment of city survey records regarding a residential property. The petitioner alleged that the respondent unlawfully encroached upon his property and constructed a structure, and that city survey records contained errors in the area measurement (showing 57.10 sq.m instead of the correct area). The court found the petitioner's claim credible and that the survey record contained technical errors requiring correction. Order: Petition ALLOWED. The court directed the petitioner to file a corrected version of the case with proper amendments to the records and records with the court file. Both parties were directed to note the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  11. 02-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  12. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  15. 20-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  16. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  17. 13-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    IInd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sangola

  18. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case 51/2026 - Krushna Namdev Babar v. Nitin Vishwambhar Babar & Kedar Rajaram Ramchandra The petitioner filed an application seeking correction/amendment of city survey records regarding a residential property. The petitioner alleged that the respondent unlawfully encroached upon his property and constructed a structure, and that city survey records contained errors in the area measurement (showing 57.10 sq.m instead of the correct area). The court found the petitioner's claim credible and that the survey record contained technical errors requiring correction. Order: Petition ALLOWED. The court directed the petitioner to file a corrected version of the case with proper amendments to the records and records with the court file. Both parties were directed to note the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case