Baliram Atkale vs Gangubai Glande Advocate - Nagtilak Vijaykumar Uttamrao — 700522/2013
Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSO070013542013
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
700522/2013
Filing Date
03-10-2013
Registration No
700522/2013
Registration Date
08-10-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Pandhurpur
Judge
4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Petitioner(s)
Baliram Atkale
Adv. Utpat A. N.
Respondent(s)
Gangubai Glande Advocate - Nagtilak Vijaykumar Uttamrao
Alka Gurav
Adv. Nagtilak Vijaykumar Uttamrao
Sharda Nimbalkar
Adv. Nagtilak Vijaykumar Uttamrao
Sulan Mahatre
Adv. Nagtilak Vijaykumar Uttamrao
Kiran Glande
Adv. Nagtilak Vijaykumar Uttamrao
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd JT. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. PANDHARPUR
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Baliram Atkale v. Gangubai Glande (Case 700522/2013) The court allowed the petitioner's application to implead proposed defendants (Respondents 6 and 7) as necessary parties to the suit concerning a property dispute. The court found that these individuals had acquired the property through a sale deed (No. 1850/2017) from earlier defendants while the case was pending, making them essential parties. The court also directed certain amendments to the pleadings and ordered that the amended case record be served on all defendants for their response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Baliram Atkale v. Gangubai Glande (Case 700522/2013) The court allowed the petitioner's application to implead proposed defendants (Respondents 6 and 7) as necessary parties to the suit concerning a property dispute. The court found that these individuals had acquired the property through a sale deed (No. 1850/2017) from earlier defendants while the case was pending, making them essential parties. The court also directed certain amendments to the pleadings and ordered that the amended case record be served on all defendants for their response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts