Sub Divisional Officer vs Chandrashekhar Mahadev Patil — 97/2021
Case under National Highways Act Section 3(H)(4). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 04th April 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHSO050017872021
Filing Number
552/2021
Filing Date
22-11-2021
Registration No
97/2021
Registration Date
22-11-2021
Court
District Court , Pandhurpur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Divisional Officer
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Chandrashekhar Mahadev Patil
Thakubai Balu Shejal
Latabai Kerappa Shejal
Parinita Chandrashekhar Patil
Bhawanipratap Chandrashekhar Patil
Tulsi Chandrashekhar Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 And Addl Sessions Judge Pandharpur
Disposed
Judgment
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Court in Pandharpur partly allowed a reference under the National Highways Act, 1956 regarding compensation for 1,300 sq.m. of acquired land (Gat No. 684) in Andhalgaon. The court held that only Chandrashekhar Mahadeo Patil was entitled to compensation, as he provided documentary evidence (7x12 extract) proving ownership, while other objectors failed to substantiate their claims or appeared without evidence; notably, Parinita Chandrashekhar Patil relinquished her claim. The court directed the Land Acquisition Officer to pay compensation to Chandrashekhar Patil after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The District Court in Pandharpur partly allowed a reference under the National Highways Act, 1956 regarding compensation for 1,300 sq.m. of acquired land (Gat No. 684) in Andhalgaon. The court held that only Chandrashekhar Mahadeo Patil was entitled to compensation, as he provided documentary evidence (7x12 extract) proving ownership, while other objectors failed to substantiate their claims or appeared without evidence; notably, Parinita Chandrashekhar Patil relinquished her claim. The court directed the Land Acquisition Officer to pay compensation to Chandrashekhar Patil after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts