Tabasum Matin Yadgiri Alias Yadgir vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 205/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 04th April 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHSO010006512026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

413/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

205/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

Decision Date

04th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

250

Police Station

Faujdar Chawadi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5),340(2),336(3),338,336(2),318(4)

Petitioner(s)

Tabasum Matin Yadgiri Alias Yadgir

Adv. Jamkhandi Nabisab Mohiyoddin

Respondent(s)

The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

04-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Arguments

31-03-2026

Arguments

30-03-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

04-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 205/2026 Decision: The court rejected Tabasum Matin Yadgiri's anticipatory bail application. The Additional Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence that the applicant, as an agent, participated in creating false and fabricated documents to fraudulently approve educational assistance scholarships for ineligible construction workers' children, resulting in misappropriation of Rs. 3.60+ crores in government funds. Reasoning: Despite the applicant's claim of limited involvement (merely filling forms), investigation papers showed she accompanied beneficiaries while acting as an agent and allegedly helped fabricate documents. The court deemed custodial interrogation necessary for proper investigation of this serious economic offense and held the case unsuitable for discretionary bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 205/2026 Decision: The court rejected Tabasum Matin Yadgiri's anticipatory bail application. The Additional Sessions Judge found prima facie evidence that the applicant, as an agent, participated in creating false and fabricated documents to fraudulently approve educational assistance scholarships for ineligible construction workers' children, resulting in misappropriation of Rs. 3.60+ crores in government funds. Reasoning: Despite the applicant's claim of limited involvement (merely filling forms), investigation papers showed she accompanied beneficiaries while acting as an agent and allegedly helped fabricate documents. The court deemed custodial interrogation necessary for proper investigation of this serious economic offense and held the case unsuitable for discretionary bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Solapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case