Mohammed Aslam Gulam Rasool Chanda vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 187/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHSO010006022026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

378/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

187/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

168

Police Station

Vijapur Naka

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 89,85,118(1),115(2),351(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Aslam Gulam Rasool Chanda

    Adv. Borgaonkar Devdatta P.

  2. 2.Tahseen Kausar Aslam Chanda

    Adv. Borgaonkar Devdatta P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 187/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mohammed Aslam Gulam Rasool Chanda and Tahseen Kausar Aslam Chanda, who were accused of administering pills to terminate a woman's pregnancy without consent, along with charges of assault and domestic abuse. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicants deliberately gave abortion pills to the informant, causing her pregnancy termination without consent, constituting a serious offense under Section 89 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (life imprisonment or up to 10 years imprisonment). The court determined that the applicants' physical presence was necessary for ongoing investigation, and releasing them on bail posed risks of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  9. 31-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  10. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  11. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  12. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  13. 20-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  14. 16-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  16. 12-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  17. 11-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  18. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 187/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mohammed Aslam Gulam Rasool Chanda and Tahseen Kausar Aslam Chanda, who were accused of administering pills to terminate a woman's pregnancy without consent, along with charges of assault and domestic abuse. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicants deliberately gave abortion pills to the informant, causing her pregnancy termination without consent, constituting a serious offense under Section 89 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (life imprisonment or up to 10 years imprisonment). The court determined that the applicants' physical presence was necessary for ongoing investigation, and releasing them on bail posed risks of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case