Basavraj Sidram Navale vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 155/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 31st March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHSO010005112026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

315/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

155/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

236

Police Station

Faujdar Chawadi

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),85,127(2),109,115(2),316(2),3(5)
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT Section 4

Petitioner(s)

Basavraj Sidram Navale

Adv. Matre Rajkumar Siddharam

Prema Basavraj Navale

Adv. Matre Rajkumar Siddharam

Akash Vyankatesh Chintamani

Adv. Matre Rajkumar Siddharam

Respondent(s)

The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

31-03-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Arguments

27-03-2026

Arguments

25-03-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

31-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Cri.B.A. No. 155/2026 Court Decision: The anticipatory bail application was partly allowed. Applicant No. 3 (Akash Vyankatesh Chintamani) was granted anticipatory bail on Rs. 20,000 bond after the court found documentary evidence (passport and flight tickets) proving he was traveling to Dubai on 17/02/2026 when the alleged neck-pressing incident occurred, establishing his alibi. However, the bail applications of Applicants 1 and 2 (Basavraj Sidram Navale and Prema Basavraj Navale) were rejected due to prima facie evidence of their involvement in a dowry-related cheating and assault scheme targeting the informant's daughters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri.B.A. No. 155/2026 Court Decision: The anticipatory bail application was partly allowed. Applicant No. 3 (Akash Vyankatesh Chintamani) was granted anticipatory bail on Rs. 20,000 bond after the court found documentary evidence (passport and flight tickets) proving he was traveling to Dubai on 17/02/2026 when the alleged neck-pressing incident occurred, establishing his alibi. However, the bail applications of Applicants 1 and 2 (Basavraj Sidram Navale and Prema Basavraj Navale) were rejected due to prima facie evidence of their involvement in a dowry-related cheating and assault scheme targeting the informant's daughters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Solapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case