Kantabai Machindra Gund vs The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 37/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSO010001182026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
72/2026
Filing Date
12-01-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
12-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Mohol
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kantabai Machindra Gund
Adv. Babre Manish Mangesh
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Kantabai Machindra Gund v. State of Maharashtra The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur granted anticipatory bail to Kantabai Machindra Gund in a case involving alleged atrocities under SC/ST Prevention Act and criminal intimidation charges. The court found no prima facie case against the applicant, noting the complaint was filed five months after the incident with no satisfactory explanation for the delay, and that the informant and applicant had prior disputes suggesting possible malicious motivation. The applicant was released on executing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 15,000 with conditions not to intimidate witnesses or commit future offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Kantabai Machindra Gund v. State of Maharashtra The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur granted anticipatory bail to Kantabai Machindra Gund in a case involving alleged atrocities under SC/ST Prevention Act and criminal intimidation charges. The court found no prima facie case against the applicant, noting the complaint was filed five months after the incident with no satisfactory explanation for the delay, and that the informant and applicant had prior disputes suggesting possible malicious motivation. The applicant was released on executing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 15,000 with conditions not to intimidate witnesses or commit future offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts