Anusaya Balasaheb Ambe etc.2 vs Sunita Sadashiv Pawar etc.10 Advocate - Nadaf Mukdumalli Hajinbeelal — 200177/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN020006362014

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200723/2014

Filing Date

24-04-2014

Registration No

200177/2014

Registration Date

02-05-2014

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 21

Petitioner(s)

Anusaya Balasaheb Ambe etc.2

Adv. Jadhav Sudhir Sukhadev

Smt. Shashikala Sonba Gol Pawar

Adv. Shah Vinod Hirachand

Respondent(s)

Sunita Sadashiv Pawar etc.10 Advocate - Nadaf Mukdumalli Hajinbeelal

Sachin Sadashiv Pawar

Kiran Baburao Pawar Deceased(Legal Heir)

Adv. Nadaf Mukdumalli Hajinbeelal

Dattakumar Baburao Pawar

Adv. Nadaf Mukdumalli Hajinbeelal

Somnath Baburao Pawar

Adv. Nadaf Mukdumalli Hajinbeelal

Promod Suresh Anand

Sou. Uma Ajit More

Adv. Nadaf Mukdumalli Hajinbeelal

Sou. Suman Anantrao Ambe

Sou. Sushila Netaji Ghadge

Smt. Lata Baburao Gol Pawar

Adv. Nadaf Mukdumalli Hajinbeelal

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI

07-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

21-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

27-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

02-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

29-11-2025

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Interim Orders

29-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The petition filed by the applicant against defendants 4, 5, and 10 seeking permission to file important documents (property deed, water bill, electricity bill, and other relevant papers) necessary to resolve the case has been allowed. While the court declined to compel the defendants to produce documents, it permitted the applicant to file only the documents, with the burden of proving authenticity remaining on the defendants. The order was passed by the Civil Judge, Sangli on 29/11/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by the applicant against defendants 4, 5, and 10 seeking permission to file important documents (property deed, water bill, electricity bill, and other relevant papers) necessary to resolve the case has been allowed. While the court declined to compel the defendants to produce documents, it permitted the applicant to file only the documents, with the burden of proving authenticity remaining on the defendants. The order was passed by the Civil Judge, Sangli on 29/11/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case