Avinash Krushna Parab etc. 5 vs Krushna Ramchandra Parab etc. 4 desease Advocate - GEERSAGAR SUDARSHAN SHRIPAD — 700039/2013
Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI070001052013
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
700039/2013
Filing Date
12-04-2013
Registration No
700039/2013
Registration Date
12-04-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Petitioner(s)
Avinash Krushna Parab etc. 5
Adv. KULKARNI ULHAS BHALCHANDRA
Dilip Krushna Parab
Adv. S.S.Girsagar
Charulata Krushna Parab @ Ankita Anand Sawant
Sarita Krushna Parab @ Priya Promod Prab
Adv. S.S.Girsagar
Samita Krushna Parab @ Rajeshri Rajandra Dhuri
Adv. S.S.Girsagar
Respondent(s)
Krushna Ramchandra Parab etc. 4 desease Advocate - GEERSAGAR SUDARSHAN SHRIPAD
Kallpana Krushna Parab
Sadanand Bhiva Kadam
Sou. Sunita Sadanand Kadam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 09-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 21-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 29-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The court rejected the petitions of defendants 3 and 4 challenging the previous order and dismissed their application for relief. The court upheld that defendants 3 and 4 should file their bail application with the proper documentation and ordered them to deposit Rs. 200 as cost, while defendant 2's plea for extension was rejected as the reasons provided were insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The court rejected the petitions of defendants 3 and 4 challenging the previous order and dismissed their application for relief. The court upheld that defendants 3 and 4 should file their bail application with the proper documentation and ordered them to deposit Rs. 200 as cost, while defendant 2's plea for extension was rejected as the reasons provided were insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts