Balkrishna Yesaji vs Chandrakant Arolkar Advocate - Prabhu Bharat Narahari — 500013/2005

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI050000492005

Arguments

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

500013/2005

Filing Date

07-02-2005

Registration No

500013/2005

Registration Date

07-02-2005

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Vengurla

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Balkrishna Yesaji

Adv. BHANAGE SHRIKRISHNA NARAYAN

Ratnprabha Yesji

Adv. Bahang S.N.

Priya Salgaonkar

Adv. Bahang S.N.

Respondent(s)

Chandrakant Arolkar Advocate - Prabhu Bharat Narahari

Gurunath Arolkar

Adv. Prabhu B.N

Nagesh Arolkar

Adv. Prabhu B.N.

Sitabai Arolkar

Adv. Prabhu B.N.

Rohini Arolkar

Adv. Prabhu B.N.

Vitthal Yesaji

Adv. Prabhu B.N.

Shri.Dev Vetoba Vahivatdar Camitee through Presid

Adv. Prabhu B.N.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

29-04-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Arguments

11-02-2026

Arguments

09-01-2026

Arguments

10-12-2025

Arguments

Interim Orders

29-08-2018
Evidence
11-09-2018
Evidence
14-11-2018
Evidence
13-12-2019
Evidence
13-12-2019
Evidence
08-01-2020
Evidence
29-01-2020
Evidence
08-09-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: This Marathi court order from Vengurla Rural (dated 25.06.2025) addresses a petition by Chandrakant Atmaram Arolkar. The court dismissed the petition, ordering that no necessary action be taken in the interest of justice. The court clarified that the petitioner's allegations against the respondent lack sufficient merit to warrant further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This Marathi court order from Vengurla Rural (dated 25.06.2025) addresses a petition by Chandrakant Atmaram Arolkar. The court dismissed the petition, ordering that no necessary action be taken in the interest of justice. The court clarified that the petitioner's allegations against the respondent lack sufficient merit to warrant further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Vengurla All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case