Rashmi Prakash Gavde @Rashmi Maruti Chavan vs Rajendra Ganpat Chavan etc., 3 Advocate - Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra — 7/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRT090000302021
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8/2021
Filing Date
14-01-2021
Registration No
7/2021
Registration Date
14-01-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Lanja
Judge
1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C LANJA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rashmi Prakash Gavde @Rashmi Maruti Chavan
Adv. Jedhe Leena Ganpat
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Ganpat Chavan etc., 3 Advocate - Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra
Narendra Ganpat Chavan
Adv. Patkar Yahswant Ramchandra
Rushikesh Maruti Chavan
Adv. Jedhe Leena Ganpat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C LANJA
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 21-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 03-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by plaintiff seeking to prevent defendants Respondents 1 & 2 from interfering with his exclusive possession of a disputed ancestral property (House No. 98) in Moje Lanja, Ratnagiri district, and seeking an injunction against any unauthorized construction or demolition was allowed. The court decreed that defendants 1 & 2 are restrained from obstructing plaintiff's possession of the property, and directed them not to carry out any construction or demolition work on the premises until final determination of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by plaintiff seeking to prevent defendants Respondents 1 & 2 from interfering with his exclusive possession of a disputed ancestral property (House No. 98) in Moje Lanja, Ratnagiri district, and seeking an injunction against any unauthorized construction or demolition was allowed. The court decreed that defendants 1 & 2 are restrained from obstructing plaintiff's possession of the property, and directed them not to carry out any construction or demolition work on the premises until final determination of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts