Sandip Daji Sangare vs Rasika Rajesh Sangare etc. — 19/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRT080000922026

Steps_Unready

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

27/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38,39

Petitioner(s)

Sandip Daji Sangare

Adv. Ujjwala Pandurang Chavan

Respondent(s)

Rasika Rajesh Sangare etc.

Suresh Sambhaji Sangare

Dhruvabal Daji Sangare

Ankush Mahadev Sangare

Savita Ganpat Bambade

Savita Sanjay Ghanekar

Deepak Anant Sangare

Arpana Anant Sangare

Swara Sandesh Basavankar

Anita Govind Basavankar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Deorukh

28-04-2026

Steps_Unready

24-04-2026

Order on Exh

23-04-2026

Order on Exh

21-04-2026

Order on Exh

16-04-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

28-04-2026
Order on T.I.

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Interim Injunction Granted. The court ordered that respondents (Defendants 1 & 2) are prohibited from carrying out any construction on the disputed property until final judgment, and must immediately stop the ongoing construction by Defendant 2. The court found that the petitioner (plaintiff) has a prima facie case regarding ownership rights to the property in question (Survey No. 146/45, Kalambaste village). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Interim Injunction Granted. The court ordered that respondents (Defendants 1 & 2) are prohibited from carrying out any construction on the disputed property until final judgment, and must immediately stop the ongoing construction by Defendant 2. The court found that the petitioner (plaintiff) has a prima facie case regarding ownership rights to the property in question (Survey No. 146/45, Kalambaste village). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Deorukh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case