Asma Bahauddin Tisekar vs Javed Vali Mohammad Dadarkar Advocate - Damale Prafulla Anant — 137/2018
Case under Muslim Women (protection of Right on Divorce) Act,1986 Section 3. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRT050006652018
Next Hearing
14th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
572/2018
Filing Date
19-07-2018
Registration No
137/2018
Registration Date
19-07-2018
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Asma Bahauddin Tisekar
Adv. Sheth Sameer Sharad
Respondent(s)
Javed Vali Mohammad Dadarkar Advocate - Damale Prafulla Anant
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this maintenance dispute case (Cri.M.A.No.137/2018), the court allowed the non-applicant's application to amend his reply by inserting material facts regarding the applicant's second marriage and his job loss due to the Israel-Palestine conflict. The non-applicant was granted permission to file the necessary amendment to his reply within three days, as the court found the subsequent events to be material and relevant to the maintenance claim under Section 125 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this maintenance dispute case (Cri.M.A.No.137/2018), the court allowed the non-applicant's application to amend his reply by inserting material facts regarding the applicant's second marriage and his job loss due to the Israel-Palestine conflict. The non-applicant was granted permission to file the necessary amendment to his reply within three days, as the court found the subsequent events to be material and relevant to the maintenance claim under Section 125 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts