Avinash Vishwas Patne vs Ramesh Mishrimal Jain Advocate - Patne Ketan Sadashiv — 500023/2013
Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRT050001912013
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
500023/2013
Filing Date
26-02-2013
Registration No
500023/2013
Registration Date
26-02-2013
Court
Civil Judge, Junior Division, Khed
Judge
2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Petitioner(s)
Avinash Vishwas Patne
Adv. Jagtap Amol Ashok
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Mishrimal Jain Advocate - Patne Ketan Sadashiv
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn J.M.F.C. Khed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: Application Exh.51 filed by the defendant has been rejected. The court found the defendant was employing delay tactics by repeatedly filing applications to defer standard rent determination, and noted the defendant's failure to comply with the previous order to deposit interim standard rent of Rs. 8,000 per month. The suit will proceed with the pending cross-examination while the interim rent remains fixed at Rs. 8,000 per month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Application Exh.51 filed by the defendant has been rejected. The court found the defendant was employing delay tactics by repeatedly filing applications to defer standard rent determination, and noted the defendant's failure to comply with the previous order to deposit interim standard rent of Rs. 8,000 per month. The suit will proceed with the pending cross-examination while the interim rent remains fixed at Rs. 8,000 per month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts