State of Maharashtra vs Ganpat Pandurang Zore Advocate - Mulye Unmesh Uday Deputy Chief LADC — 27/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,64(2)(C),64(2)(Z),65(2),. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHRT010005032025
Next Hearing
15th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
183/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
02-07-2025
Court
District and session court , Ratnagiri
Judge
3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
FIR Details
FIR Number
99
Police Station
Lanja Police Station Lanja.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Thakur Anupama Yogesh
Respondent(s)
Ganpat Pandurang Zore Advocate - Mulye Unmesh Uday Deputy Chief LADC
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-1 and Addl.Session Judge Ratnagiri
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 09-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 08-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 06-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 04-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
BAIL APPLICATION REJECTED The Special Court, Ratnagiri rejected the bail application of Ganpat Pandurang Zore in a POCSO case involving sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl. The court found prima facie evidence of aggravated sexual assault based on the victim's statements and medical reports, deeming the charges serious and heinous. The accused's denials and reliance on a negative chemical analyzer report were insufficient to overcome the substantial material in the charge-sheet warranting his continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL APPLICATION REJECTED The Special Court, Ratnagiri rejected the bail application of Ganpat Pandurang Zore in a POCSO case involving sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl. The court found prima facie evidence of aggravated sexual assault based on the victim's statements and medical reports, deeming the charges serious and heinous. The accused's denials and reliance on a negative chemical analyzer report were insufficient to overcome the substantial material in the charge-sheet warranting his continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts