Dr Vyankataramanna Chandramouli Sharma @ Dr M Vyankataramanna Sharma Authorized By Dr Virinchi Ven vs Manoj Rajaram Gujar Advocate - Jadhav R. R. — 95/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 31, 34, 36 and 37. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 09th May 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHRG190012062023

Steps

Next Hearing

09th May 2026

e-Filing Number

23-10-2023

Filing Number

351/2023

Filing Date

25-10-2023

Registration No

95/2023

Registration Date

25-10-2023

Court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 31, 34, 36 and 37

Petitioner(s)

Dr Vyankataramanna Chandramouli Sharma @ Dr M Vyankataramanna Sharma Authorized By Dr Virinchi Ven

Adv. AMBRE AJIT ANANT

Respondent(s)

Manoj Rajaram Gujar Advocate - Jadhav R. R.

Sonal Dhondiram Utekar

Adv. Rajesh A. Sheth

Shamlal Prabhulal Sharma

Adv. Rajesh A. Sheth

Rashami Nehal Dhadda

Adv. Jadhav R. R.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mahad

21-04-2026

Steps

01-04-2026

Steps

20-03-2026

Steps

05-03-2026

Steps

29-01-2026

Steps

Interim Orders

03-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The petition is allowed. The court sets aside an order dated 07.04.2025 that had been passed against Respondent No. 4 without affidavit (without sufficient evidence), and permits Respondent No. 4 to file an additional affidavit in the case. The court imposes cost of Rs. 1,000/- on Respondent No. 4 to be paid to the petitioner as compensation for delay caused by the respondent's conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition is allowed. The court sets aside an order dated 07.04.2025 that had been passed against Respondent No. 4 without affidavit (without sufficient evidence), and permits Respondent No. 4 to file an additional affidavit in the case. The court imposes cost of Rs. 1,000/- on Respondent No. 4 to be paid to the petitioner as compensation for delay caused by the respondent's conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Court of Civil Judge S.D. Mahad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case