State of Maharashtra Through Neral Police Station vs Yogesh Yashwant Humane Advocate - Bangera A.S. — 51/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),85,82(1),82(2),316(2),318(2),318(4),11,5(2),352,351(2). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG170006272025
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
467/2025
Filing Date
01-04-2025
Registration No
51/2025
Registration Date
01-04-2025
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
FIR Details
FIR Number
236
Police Station
Neral Police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Neral Police Station
Adv. Government pleader
Respondent(s)
Yogesh Yashwant Humane Advocate - Bangera A.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Charge
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 24-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 23-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 15-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 07-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Special Judge at Panvel rejected the regular bail application of accused Yogesh Yashwant Humane, who is charged with cheating, bigamy, and sexual offenses against multiple women. The court found that the accused used a systematic modus operandi to defraud women through matrimonial websites by obtaining large sums of money (₹15-20 lakhs) and forcing them to take loans for vehicles, while concealing his prior marriage(s). Given the serious nature of the offenses, the accused's antecedents, and the risk of recidivism, the court determined bail was not appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Special Judge at Panvel rejected the regular bail application of accused Yogesh Yashwant Humane, who is charged with cheating, bigamy, and sexual offenses against multiple women. The court found that the accused used a systematic modus operandi to defraud women through matrimonial websites by obtaining large sums of money (₹15-20 lakhs) and forcing them to take loans for vehicles, while concealing his prior marriage(s). Given the serious nature of the offenses, the accused's antecedents, and the risk of recidivism, the court determined bail was not appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts