Sanjay Rajender Sharma vs The State of Maharashtra — 185/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170003852026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
295/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
185/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
Panvel Taluka Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Rajender Sharma
Adv. Ankit Bangera
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel
Disposed
Order
Order
Reply/Say
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order | |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 04-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Judge at Panvel granted anticipatory bail to Sanjay Rajender Sharma in a case involving alleged sexual misconduct and false promise of marriage. The court found that since both the applicant and victim were married, aware of each other's marital status, and consenting adults who cohabitated for considerable time, the charge of false promise of marriage was weak; physical custody was not required for investigation purposes. The applicant was released on bail with conditions including Rs. 30,000 bond, cooperation with investigation, and restrictions on contacting the victim or leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Special Judge at Panvel granted anticipatory bail to Sanjay Rajender Sharma in a case involving alleged sexual misconduct and false promise of marriage. The court found that since both the applicant and victim were married, aware of each other's marital status, and consenting adults who cohabitated for considerable time, the charge of false promise of marriage was weak; physical custody was not required for investigation purposes. The applicant was released on bail with conditions including Rs. 30,000 bond, cooperation with investigation, and restrictions on contacting the victim or leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts