SURAJ TATYARAM SAYKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 169/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHRG170003512026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
268/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
169/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad
Judge
6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
169
Police Station
Kharghar Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURAJ TATYARAM SAYKAR
Adv. NAGARE VIKAS KISAN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad
Disposed
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 28-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted bail to Suraj Tatyaram Saikar in a cybercrime-related cheating case under BNS Section 318(4) and IT Act Section 66-D. Although the applicant had prior similar offences and received ₹4,00,000 as a beneficiary in an online investment fraud scheme, the court found that investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and the co-accused was already on bail, making further custody unnecessary. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including ₹60,000 bond, weekly police reporting, and no contact with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel granted bail to Suraj Tatyaram Saikar in a cybercrime-related cheating case under BNS Section 318(4) and IT Act Section 66-D. Although the applicant had prior similar offences and received ₹4,00,000 as a beneficiary in an online investment fraud scheme, the court found that investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and the co-accused was already on bail, making further custody unnecessary. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including ₹60,000 bond, weekly police reporting, and no contact with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts