SUHAS UTTAM DHANVE vs State of Maharashtra through kharghar police station — 147/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 438. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRG170003012026

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

228/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

3-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

Kharghar Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUHAS UTTAM DHANVE

    Adv. Adv Akshaya Wakale

  2. 2.UTTAM HASU DHANVE

    Adv. Adv Akshaya Wakale

  3. 3.RAJASHREE UTTAM DHANVE

    Adv. Adv Akshaya Wakale

  4. 4.PRIYANKA SIDDHANT RANDIVE

    Adv. Adv Akshaya Wakale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through kharghar police station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel-Raigad, partially allowed a pre-arrest bail application in a matrimonial offence case involving alleged dowry harassment and Stridhan (bridal ornaments) misappropriation. The court rejected bail for applicant No.1 (the husband), finding custodial interrogation necessary due to conflicting claims on Stridhan custody, but granted pre-arrest bail to applicants No.2-4 (parents and sister-in-law) due to vague allegations against them, on conditions including bond of Rs.15,000 each and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist. Raigad

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel-Raigad, partially allowed a pre-arrest bail application in a matrimonial offence case involving alleged dowry harassment and Stridhan (bridal ornaments) misappropriation. The court rejected bail for applicant No.1 (the husband), finding custodial interrogation necessary due to conflicting claims on Stridhan custody, but granted pre-arrest bail to applicants No.2-4 (parents and sister-in-law) due to vague allegations against them, on conditions including bond of Rs.15,000 each and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case