Akhtar Habib Baitha vs The State of Maharashtra — 130/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 31st March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHRG170002732026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

205/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

130/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad

Judge

6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

224

Police Station

Khopoli Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1)

Petitioner(s)

Akhtar Habib Baitha

Adv. Ankit Bangera

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 6-District Judge 4 and Addl.Session Judge, Panvel-Raigad

31-03-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Order

25-03-2026

Order

24-03-2026

Order

17-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

31-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel rejected the bail application of Akhtar Habib Baitha, who is accused of murdering Paras Singh by striking him with a stone over a Rs. 6,000 debt dispute on September 10-11, 2025. The court found prima facie evidence of murder, noting the applicant absconded and was arrested near the Nepal border, and concluded there was substantial risk of witness intimidation and further absconding if bail were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge at Panvel rejected the bail application of Akhtar Habib Baitha, who is accused of murdering Paras Singh by striking him with a stone over a Rs. 6,000 debt dispute on September 10-11, 2025. The court found prima facie evidence of murder, noting the applicant absconded and was arrested near the Nepal border, and concluded there was substantial risk of witness intimidation and further absconding if bail were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Addl. Sessions Judge, Panvel, Dist., Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case