State of Maharashtra Through Nagothane Police Station Cr. No. 130/2025 vs Dipali Ashok Niragude And Other 02 Advocate - Shinde Manoj Krishnakant — 3/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238,61(2),140(1),324(4),3(5),. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHRG150000542026
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
34/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
22-01-2026
Court
District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon
Judge
1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
Nagothane Police Stn.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Nagothane Police Station Cr. No. 130/2025
Respondent(s)
Dipali Ashok Niragude And Other 02 Advocate - Shinde Manoj Krishnakant
Umesh Sadu Mahakal
Supriya Prakash Chaudhari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 2 and Addl Session Judge Mangaon
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Notice Ready
Notice Ready
Charge
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 08-04-2026 | Notice Ready | |
| 25-03-2026 | Notice Ready | |
| 13-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: Accused No. 3 Supriya Prakash Chaudhari's bail application in a murder case was rejected. The court found substantial evidence of her involvement in a premeditated murder conspiracy, including creating a fake Instagram account to lure the victim and participating in the crime's execution. Although the accused is 19 years old and pursuing education, the court held that the brutal and well-planned nature of the offense outweighed mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Accused No. 3 Supriya Prakash Chaudhari's bail application in a murder case was rejected. The court found substantial evidence of her involvement in a premeditated murder conspiracy, including creating a fake Instagram account to lure the victim and participating in the crime's execution. Although the accused is 19 years old and pursuing education, the court held that the brutal and well-planned nature of the offense outweighed mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts