Ramchandra Bhaskar gharat Alias Mhatre vs No Anyone — 315/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Status: Public Notice/Proclamation. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG140026172025
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
05-11-2025
Filing Number
453/2025
Filing Date
19-11-2025
Registration No
315/2025
Registration Date
19-11-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramchandra Bhaskar gharat Alias Mhatre
Adv. Pradhan V.A.
Deubai Alias Prabhawati Shankar Mhatre
Sudhabai Bhaskar Gharat Alias Mhatre Alis Sunanda Chintaman Gharat
Sonubai Bhaskar Gharat Alias Mhatre Alias Suman Chintaman Gharat
Respondent(s)
No Anyone
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Public Notice/Proclamation
Public Notice/Proclamation
Steps
Order on Exh
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation | |
| 12-03-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation | |
| 09-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 21-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: In CMA No. 315 of 2025, the amendment application filed by Ramchandra Bhaskar Gharat and others to correct a typographical error in the Hissa number of the suit property was allowed. The court found that clarifying the Hissa number was necessary to determine the real questions in controversy and that allowing the amendment would cause no prejudice to any party. The applicants were directed to carry out the amendment within 14 days and file the corrected application on record, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In CMA No. 315 of 2025, the amendment application filed by Ramchandra Bhaskar Gharat and others to correct a typographical error in the Hissa number of the suit property was allowed. The court found that clarifying the Hissa number was necessary to determine the real questions in controversy and that allowing the amendment would cause no prejudice to any party. The applicants were directed to carry out the amendment within 14 days and file the corrected application on record, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts