Apurva Jagadish Mhatre vs No Anyone — 171/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG140015492025
e-Filing Number
20-06-2025
Filing Number
249/2025
Filing Date
23-06-2025
Registration No
171/2025
Registration Date
23-06-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Apurva Jagadish Mhatre
Adv. MHATRE TRUPTI KUNAL
Respondent(s)
No Anyone
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
Disposed
Arguments
Steps
Steps
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 08-01-2026 | Steps | |
| 23-12-2025 | Steps | |
| 16-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court partly allowed Apurva Jagdish Mhatre's application and issued a Heirship Certificate recognizing her as a legal heir of her deceased father, Jagdish Dattaram Mhatre (who died intestate on 26.02.2022). No objections were raised by the public after newspaper notices and proclamation. However, the court declined to mention any specific property in the certificate, clarifying that a heirship certificate merely recognizes legal heirs without determining property rights, and stipulated the certificate should be used only for its stated purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court partly allowed Apurva Jagdish Mhatre's application and issued a Heirship Certificate recognizing her as a legal heir of her deceased father, Jagdish Dattaram Mhatre (who died intestate on 26.02.2022). No objections were raised by the public after newspaper notices and proclamation. However, the court declined to mention any specific property in the certificate, clarifying that a heirship certificate merely recognizes legal heirs without determining property rights, and stipulated the certificate should be used only for its stated purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts