sandip dharmaji patil vs No Anyone — 127/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 3. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG140011002025
e-Filing Number
03-05-2025
Filing Number
189/2025
Filing Date
06-05-2025
Registration No
127/2025
Registration Date
06-05-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
sandip dharmaji patil
Adv. PATIL MADHAVI JAGANNATH
lata pandurang patil @ bhanumati dharmaji patil
chayaa digambar mhatre alias chayaa dharmaji patil
darshana dinesh tandel @ yashoda dharmaji patil
usha shyam patil @ usha dharmaji patil
pooja sanjay bhagat alias prabhavati dharmaji patil
havesh bhalchandra keni
tushar bhalchandra keni
vanshri vivek rane
Respondent(s)
No Anyone
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Uran.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Dismissal Order
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-02-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 06-01-2026 | Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court partially allowed the application and issued a Heirship Certificate recognizing seven applicants (one son, five daughters, and three grandchildren) as the legal heirs of deceased Sumati Dharmaji Patil, who died intestate in 2021. The court clarified that the certificate merely recognizes legal heirs and does not determine any property rights, as there were discrepancies in property descriptions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court partially allowed the application and issued a Heirship Certificate recognizing seven applicants (one son, five daughters, and three grandchildren) as the legal heirs of deceased Sumati Dharmaji Patil, who died intestate in 2021. The court clarified that the certificate merely recognizes legal heirs and does not determine any property rights, as there were discrepancies in property descriptions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts