Sanjay Popatrao Shirole vs No Anyone — 16/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG140000542026
e-Filing Number
02-01-2026
Filing Number
20/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Judge, J.D.and J.M.F.C., Uran
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanjay Popatrao Shirole
Adv. Mokal Sampada S.
-
2.Rajendra Popatrao Shirole
-
3.Umesh Popatrao Shirole
-
4.Padmaja Chandrakant Pathare Alias Padmaja Popatrav Shirloe
Respondent(s)
-
1.No Anyone
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted the application and issued a Heirship Certificate to the four applicants (three sons and one daughter) as legal heirs of deceased Popatrao Chimaji Shirole, who died intestate in November 2025. The certificate entitles them to claim their share of land in Village Chanje, Raigad district, which was acquired by the government for CIDCO, with no objections raised during the public notice period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C. Uran
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2026
The court granted the application and issued a Heirship Certificate to the four applicants (three sons and one daughter) as legal heirs of deceased Popatrao Chimaji Shirole, who died intestate in November 2025. The certificate entitles them to claim their share of land in Village Chanje, Raigad district, which was acquired by the government for CIDCO, with no objections raised during the public notice period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts