State Through Excise Department Flying Squad No.1 Alibag vs Yashwant Krushna Thakur — 219/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG120003172025
Filing Number
285/2025
Filing Date
18-Sep-2025
Registration No
219/2025
Registration Date
18-Sep-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
117
Police Station
State Excise Department, Flying Squad, Alibag
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Through Excise Department Flying Squad No.1 Alibag
Adv. Naik S. Y.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Yashwant Krushna Thakur
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Murud acquitted the accused, Yashwant Krishna Thakur, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for unlicensed liquor possession and sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt, as no chemical analysis report of the seized liquor was submitted and no independent corroborating witness testimony was provided to establish that the seized material was indeed illicit country liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
-
21-Jan-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
-
17-Dec-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud
-
18-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 219/2025
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Murud acquitted the accused, Yashwant Krishna Thakur, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for unlicensed liquor possession and sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt, as no chemical analysis report of the seized liquor was submitted and no independent corroborating witness testimony was provided to establish that the seized material was indeed illicit country liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts