State Through Excise Department Flying Squad No.1 Alibag vs Yashwant Krushna Thakur — 219/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG120003172025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

285/2025

Filing Date

18-09-2025

Registration No

219/2025

Registration Date

18-09-2025

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

117

Police Station

State Excise Department, Flying Squad, Alibag

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State Through Excise Department Flying Squad No.1 Alibag

Adv. Naik S. Y.

Respondent(s)

Yashwant Krushna Thakur

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dvn. and J. M. F. C. Murud

10-03-2026

Disposed

21-01-2026

Arguments

17-12-2025

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

18-11-2025

Evidence

18-09-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Murud acquitted the accused, Yashwant Krishna Thakur, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for unlicensed liquor possession and sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt, as no chemical analysis report of the seized liquor was submitted and no independent corroborating witness testimony was provided to establish that the seized material was indeed illicit country liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Murud acquitted the accused, Yashwant Krishna Thakur, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for unlicensed liquor possession and sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt, as no chemical analysis report of the seized liquor was submitted and no independent corroborating witness testimony was provided to establish that the seized material was indeed illicit country liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C.,Murud All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case