Sunita Sharad Sanadi vs Nil — 1406/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 08th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG040033012025
e-Filing Number
16-09-2025
Filing Number
3677/2025
Filing Date
06-10-2025
Registration No
1406/2025
Registration Date
29-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D. PANVEL
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunita Sharad Sanadi
Adv. TAJANE NISHITA VIJAY
Sonal Harshad Mhapankar Alias Ms Sonal Sharad Sanadi
Adv. TAJANE NISHITA VIJAY
Saiprasad Sharad Sanadi
Adv. TAJANE NISHITA VIJAY
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D. PANVEL
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 15-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the application for issuance of a Heirship Certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, recognizing Mrs. Sunita Sharad Sanadi (wife), Mrs. Sonal Sharad Sanadi (daughter), Mr. Saiprasad Sharad Sanadi (son), and Pushpa Shankar Sanadi (mother) as legal heirs of the deceased Sharad Shankar Sanadi. The court found sufficient evidence supporting their claims and noted no objections were raised after public notice, making the inclusion of all four heirs appropriate for inheritance purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the application for issuance of a Heirship Certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, recognizing Mrs. Sunita Sharad Sanadi (wife), Mrs. Sonal Sharad Sanadi (daughter), Mr. Saiprasad Sharad Sanadi (son), and Pushpa Shankar Sanadi (mother) as legal heirs of the deceased Sharad Shankar Sanadi. The court found sufficient evidence supporting their claims and noted no objections were raised after public notice, making the inclusion of all four heirs appropriate for inheritance purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts