Fasubai Chandrakant Phadke Alias Fashibai Chander Phadke vs Shantabai Bhau Bhopi — 91/2026

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 21-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHRG040006632026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

723/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

91/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Panvel

Judge

2-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6
Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 39, Rule 1 And 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Fasubai Chandrakant Phadke Alias Fashibai Chander Phadke

    Adv. SHINDE VINOD UTTAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shantabai Bhau Bhopi

  2. 2.Ganesh Bhagwan Patil

Case History

  1. 21-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for an ex-parte injunction, finding insufficient evidence on record to support her apprehension that defendant no. 1 would sell the remaining property. Instead, the court issued notice to both defendants to show cause why an injunction should not be granted, with the matter returnable on 09/03/2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division and Add.CJM Panvel

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 91/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for an ex-parte injunction, finding insufficient evidence on record to support her apprehension that defendant no. 1 would sell the remaining property. Instead, the court issued notice to both defendants to show cause why an injunction should not be granted, with the matter returnable on 09/03/2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case