Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Alibag through Mrs. Sharada Sharad Powar vs Gorakshanath Laxman Navrikar and other 25 Advocate - Thakur P. M. — 50/2021
Case under Environment (protection) Act Section 15(1). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG030001472021
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
145/2021
Filing Date
08-04-2021
Registration No
50/2021
Registration Date
08-04-2021
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Raigarh
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Alibag through Mrs. Sharada Sharad Powar
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Gorakshanath Laxman Navrikar and other 25 Advocate - Thakur P. M.
Jaywant Mayaji Balkavde
Vitthal Lakhama Mhatre
Surekha Krushna Mankar
Ganesh Govinda Mankar
Ramakant Dharma Mankar
Kishor Panduranga Gaikwad
Sharad Jagannath Bedekar
Pushpa Sharad Ranade
Ramchandra Ganpat Mhatre
Sunil Satish Gupta
Munaf Ali Gondekar
Rohit Shankar Patil
Shankar Maraba Bhoir
Nitin Shankar Bhoir
Satish Rajaram Mukadam
Dilip Rajaram Mukadam
Chandrakant Laxman Ghatavakar
Vasant Damodar Raut
Sudhakar Madan Patil
Urmila Laxman Mhatre
Madhukar Balkrushna Cherkar
Vilas Motiram Nagaonkar
Vishvanath Laxman Navrikar
Asmita Sharad Dandekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Raigad-ALIBAG
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: Regulation Petition Case No. 50/2021, Judgment No. 115/K and 223/K (Raigad High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the appeals and upheld the original orders regarding unauthorized construction violations in coastal areas. The court rejected the appellants' contentions on procedural and substantive grounds, finding that the respondents failed to provide adequate documentary evidence and that the construction violated CRZ (Coastal Regulation Zone) norms under the 122/1A/1B regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: Regulation Petition Case No. 50/2021, Judgment No. 115/K and 223/K (Raigad High Court) Outcome: The court dismissed the appeals and upheld the original orders regarding unauthorized construction violations in coastal areas. The court rejected the appellants' contentions on procedural and substantive grounds, finding that the respondents failed to provide adequate documentary evidence and that the construction violated CRZ (Coastal Regulation Zone) norms under the 122/1A/1B regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts