Maruti Shankar Bhaskar vs Ganesh Genbhao Bhaskar Advocate - Udawant Chetan Balasaheb — 242/2022
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU240019442022
Filing Number
307/2022
Filing Date
15-Oct-2022
Registration No
242/2022
Registration Date
15-Oct-2022
Court
Civil Court,Ghodegaon
Judge
2-2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Maruti Shankar Bhaskar
Adv. Pokharkar Anil Gangaram
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganesh Genbhao Bhaskar Advocate - Udawant Chetan Balasaheb
-
2.Kisan Shankar Bhaskar
Adv. Udawant Chetan Balasaheb
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
16-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
06-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
28-Nov-2025
W.S. and Say
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
16-Oct-2025
W.S. and Say
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
08-Sep-2025
W.S. and Say
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
-
15-Mar-2025
Evidence
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
22-Jan-2025
Evidence
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
26-Aug-2024
Evidence
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
09-May-2024
Evidence
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
15-Mar-2024
Evidence
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
20-Feb-2024
Issues
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
10-Jan-2024
Issues
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
05-Dec-2023
Issues
Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
-
22-Nov-2023
Issues
Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
-
20-Sep-2023
Issues
Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
-
26-Jul-2023
Issues
Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
-
10-Jun-2023
Issues
Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
-
15-Apr-2023
Issues
Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
-
27-Feb-2023
Issues
Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Ghodegaon, Pune
-
16-Jan-2023
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against Defendant No. 1. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the evidence suggests that Defendant No. 2 (the co-owner of the disputed agricultural property) is conducting the construction, not Defendant No. 1 as claimed. Since the balance of convenience favors Defendant No. 2 who would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were granted, the application was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
13-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
11-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
04-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
26-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
23-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
20-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
15-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
12-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
29-Nov-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
14-Nov-2022
W.S. and Say
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
05-Nov-2022
Awaiting Summons
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
31-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
19-Oct-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
19-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and J.m.f.c., Ghodegaon.
-
15-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 242/2022
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against Defendant No. 1. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the evidence suggests that Defendant No. 2 (the co-owner of the disputed agricultural property) is conducting the construction, not Defendant No. 1 as claimed. Since the balance of convenience favors Defendant No. 2 who would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were granted, the application was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts