Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar vs Navnath Gulabrao Jagtap Advocate - Pilane babu namdeo — 100/2023

Case under Transfer of Property Act Section 60. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 09-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU130003702023

Filing Number

141/2023

Filing Date

10-Mar-2023

Registration No

100/2023

Registration Date

16-Mar-2023

Court

Civil Court,Saswad

Judge

2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Transfer of Property Act Section 60

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar

    Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar

  2. 2.Kiran Gajanan MahurkarRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar

    Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar

  3. 3.Sushila Gajanan MahurkarRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar

    Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar

  4. 4.Sunanda Aba MoreRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar

    Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar

  5. 5.Ragini Ranjitsing JadhavRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar

    Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar

  6. 6.Nilam Manohar KhalateRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar

    Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Navnath Gulabrao Jagtap Advocate - Pilane babu namdeo

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  3. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  7. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  8. 26-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The defendant's application for transfer of the suit to a court with proper pecuniary jurisdiction was rejected. The court held that the plaint valuation of Rs. 3,00,000 (based on the mortgage deeds of Rs. 1,50,000 each) falls within its pecuniary jurisdiction limit of Rs. 5,00,000, and the disputed amount of Rs. 6,88,000 claimed by the defendant cannot determine jurisdiction—such factual disputes must be resolved during trial, not at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  10. 13-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  11. 08-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  12. 11-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  13. 23-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  14. 18-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  15. 06-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  16. 01-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  17. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  18. 14-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  19. 28-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  20. 09-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  21. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  22. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  23. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  24. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  25. 04-Mar-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  27. 23-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  28. 03-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  29. 05-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  30. 12-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  31. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  32. 08-Nov-2023

    List of Witness

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  33. 23-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  34. 05-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  35. 15-Sep-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  36. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  37. 01-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  38. 17-Aug-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  39. 20-Jul-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  40. 15-Jun-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  41. 06-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. And J.M.F.C,Saswad

  42. 17-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 10-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The defendant's application for transfer of the suit to a court with proper pecuniary jurisdiction was rejected. The court held that the plaint valuation of Rs. 3,00,000 (based on the mortgage deeds of Rs. 1,50,000 each) falls within its pecuniary jurisdiction limit of Rs. 5,00,000, and the disputed amount of Rs. 6,88,000 claimed by the defendant cannot determine jurisdiction—such factual disputes must be resolved during trial, not at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case