Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar vs Navnath Gulabrao Jagtap Advocate - Pilane babu namdeo — 100/2023
Case under Transfer of Property Act Section 60. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHPU130003702023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
141/2023
Filing Date
10-03-2023
Registration No
100/2023
Registration Date
16-03-2023
Court
Civil Court,Saswad
Judge
2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. AND J.M.F.C,Saswad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar
Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar
Kiran Gajanan MahurkarRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar
Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar
Sushila Gajanan MahurkarRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar
Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar
Sunanda Aba MoreRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar
Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar
Ragini Ranjitsing JadhavRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar
Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar
Nilam Manohar KhalateRepresented by Power of Attorney -Sanjay Gajanan Mahurkar
Adv. Jadhav mahesh dnyneshwar
Respondent(s)
Navnath Gulabrao Jagtap Advocate - Pilane babu namdeo
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. AND J.M.F.C,Saswad
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's application for transfer of the suit to a court with proper pecuniary jurisdiction was rejected. The court held that the plaint valuation of Rs. 3,00,000 (based on the mortgage deeds of Rs. 1,50,000 each) falls within its pecuniary jurisdiction limit of Rs. 5,00,000, and the disputed amount of Rs. 6,88,000 claimed by the defendant cannot determine jurisdiction—such factual disputes must be resolved during trial, not at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's application for transfer of the suit to a court with proper pecuniary jurisdiction was rejected. The court held that the plaint valuation of Rs. 3,00,000 (based on the mortgage deeds of Rs. 1,50,000 each) falls within its pecuniary jurisdiction limit of Rs. 5,00,000, and the disputed amount of Rs. 6,88,000 claimed by the defendant cannot determine jurisdiction—such factual disputes must be resolved during trial, not at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts