Bharatram Ramsamuj Prajapati vs Designated officer and Regional officer Ka Prabhag Regional office Advocate - Bhapkar Maruti Genaba — 15/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHPU100000152025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2025

Filing Number

15/2025

Filing Date

20-01-2025

Registration No

15/2025

Registration Date

20-01-2025

Court

Civil Court,Pcmc

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Bharatram Ramsamuj Prajapati

Adv. Dhanpat Mansaram Yadav

Respondent(s)

Designated officer and Regional officer Ka Prabhag Regional office Advocate - Bhapkar Maruti Genaba

Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpri, Pune 18

Adv. Bhapkar Maruti Genaba

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C., P.C.M.C. Akurdi

07-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

19-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

25-11-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

09-10-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

20-08-2025

For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready

Interim Orders

19-04-2025
Issues

This document contains only the issues framed in the case R.C.S. No.15/2025 (Bharatram Prajapati vs. P.C.M.C. & Ors.) dated 19/04/2025 before the P.C.M.C. Court, Akurdi, Pune. The four issues concern whether the defendant's notice of 08/01/2025 is illegal, and whether the plaintiff is entitled to mandatory injunction and/or declaration and permanent injunction. No judgment or order on merits has been passed yet—this is merely a procedural document framing the issues for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document contains only the issues framed in the case R.C.S. No.15/2025 (Bharatram Prajapati vs. P.C.M.C. & Ors.) dated 19/04/2025 before the P.C.M.C. Court, Akurdi, Pune. The four issues concern whether the defendant's notice of 08/01/2025 is illegal, and whether the plaintiff is entitled to mandatory injunction and/or declaration and permanent injunction. No judgment or order on merits has been passed yet—this is merely a procedural document framing the issues for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court,Pcmc All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case