Krushna Bhaskar Sonar etc. vs State of Maharashtra Through Sahakarnagar Police Station etc. Advocate - APP — 1252/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 28th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHPU010029342026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
2060/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
1252/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Pune
Judge
12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
Sahakarnagar Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krushna Bhaskar Sonar etc.
Adv. BHALERAO AKSHAY SHIVAJI
Rekha bhaskar sonar
Adv. BHALERAO AKSHAY SHIVAJI
Bhaskar Marutirao sonar
Adv. BHALERAO AKSHAY SHIVAJI
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Sahakarnagar Police Station etc. Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
NIRBHAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DISTRICT JUDGE -8 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE PUNE
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Supply of Copies
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | Order | |
| 17-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 07-03-2026 | Supply of Copies |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the bail application filed by three accused (Krushna Bhaskar Sonar, Rekha Bhaskar Sonar, and Bhaskar Marutirao Sonar) in a POCSO case involving a 15-year-old victim. The court found that despite the victim's no-objection stance, medical evidence and investigation records supported the prosecution's case, noting the accused had taken the victim across state lines and that other accused helped them evade arrest, warranting continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the bail application filed by three accused (Krushna Bhaskar Sonar, Rekha Bhaskar Sonar, and Bhaskar Marutirao Sonar) in a POCSO case involving a 15-year-old victim. The court found that despite the victim's no-objection stance, medical evidence and investigation records supported the prosecution's case, noting the accused had taken the victim across state lines and that other accused helped them evade arrest, warranting continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts