Shamkant Motilal Bhavsar vs Nil — 86/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2(1). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHNS280016902025
e-Filing Number
28-10-2025
Filing Number
1737/2025
Filing Date
30-Oct-2025
Registration No
86/2025
Registration Date
30-Oct-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Sinnar
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL Judge Junior Division, Sinnar
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shamkant Motilal Bhavsar
Adv. Dilip S Shinde
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed the application and issued a heirship certificate recognizing Shamkant Motilal Bhavsar as the sole legal heir of deceased Sanjay Bharat Bhavsar (who died on 27/11/2007), based on the petitioner's affidavit, death certificate, and newspaper proclamation to which no objections were raised. The court found it had jurisdiction over the matter as the deceased's permanent residence was within its jurisdiction and granted the certificate to enable mutation of the inherited property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge Junior Division, Sinnar
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge Junior Division, Sinnar
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
Jt. CIVIL Judge Junior Division, Sinnar
-
07-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 86/2025
The court allowed the application and issued a heirship certificate recognizing Shamkant Motilal Bhavsar as the sole legal heir of deceased Sanjay Bharat Bhavsar (who died on 27/11/2007), based on the petitioner's affidavit, death certificate, and newspaper proclamation to which no objections were raised. The court found it had jurisdiction over the matter as the deceased's permanent residence was within its jurisdiction and granted the certificate to enable mutation of the inherited property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts