Kaushabai Nivrutti Tupe vs Shankar Bahiru Tambe Advocate - Tambe Krishnakant S. — 162/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 109. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS280014902023

Filing Number

812/2023

Filing Date

13-Apr-2018

Registration No

162/2023

Registration Date

13-Apr-2018

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Sinnar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 109

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kaushabai Nivrutti Tupe

    Adv. Khule Akash k

  2. 2.Jija Urf JIjiabai Bahiru Tambe

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shankar Bahiru Tambe Advocate - Tambe Krishnakant S.

  2. 2.Ambadas Bahiru Tambe

  3. 3.Dashrath Bahiru Tambe

  4. 4.Prashant Kantilal Hiran

  5. 5.Collector, Nashik

  6. 6.S.L.A.O. Samrudhi

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: In *Kaushabai Tupe v. Shankar Tambe* (RCS 162/2023), the Civil Court at Sinnar rejected an application filed by defendants no.1 and 2 seeking judicial notice that defendant no.3 was colluding with plaintiffs to prolong proceedings in this partition suit filed in 2017. The court held that under Order XII of the Code of Civil Procedure, defendants are statutorily permitted to support a plaintiff's claim in civil suits, and therefore defendant no.3's conduct did not violate legal provisions. The application was rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 03-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  15. 20-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  16. 17-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  17. 13-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  18. 06-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  19. 23-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 23-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  21. 23-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  22. 09-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 09-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 09-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  25. 29-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  26. 17-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  27. 04-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  28. 14-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  29. 07-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  30. 07-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  31. 23-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  32. 02-Sep-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  33. 05-Aug-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  34. 29-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  35. 29-Jul-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  36. 01-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  37. 27-Jun-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  38. 29-Apr-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  39. 29-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  40. 04-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  41. 22-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  42. 22-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  43. 07-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  44. 17-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  45. 10-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  46. 06-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  47. 26-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  48. 12-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  49. 22-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  50. 24-Sep-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  51. 20-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  52. 23-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  53. 09-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  54. 18-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  55. 11-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  56. 23-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  57. 02-Apr-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  58. 02-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  59. 19-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  60. 27-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  61. 27-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  62. 23-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  63. 20-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  64. 20-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  65. 16-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  66. 02-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  67. 12-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  68. 02-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  69. 28-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  70. 13-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  71. 18-Jul-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar

  72. 22-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  73. 13-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 162/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In *Kaushabai Tupe v. Shankar Tambe* (RCS 162/2023), the Civil Court at Sinnar rejected an application filed by defendants no.1 and 2 seeking judicial notice that defendant no.3 was colluding with plaintiffs to prolong proceedings in this partition suit filed in 2017. The court held that under Order XII of the Code of Civil Procedure, defendants are statutorily permitted to support a plaintiff's claim in civil suits, and therefore defendant no.3's conduct did not violate legal provisions. The application was rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case