Kaushabai Nivrutti Tupe vs Shankar Bahiru Tambe Advocate - Tambe Krishnakant S. — 162/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 109. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS280014902023
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
812/2023
Filing Date
13-04-2018
Registration No
162/2023
Registration Date
13-04-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Sinnar
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kaushabai Nivrutti Tupe
Adv. Khule Akash k
Jija Urf JIjiabai Bahiru Tambe
Respondent(s)
Shankar Bahiru Tambe Advocate - Tambe Krishnakant S.
Ambadas Bahiru Tambe
Dashrath Bahiru Tambe
Prashant Kantilal Hiran
Collector, Nashik
S.L.A.O. Samrudhi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Sinnar
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 18-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 17-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In *Kaushabai Tupe v. Shankar Tambe* (RCS 162/2023), the Civil Court at Sinnar rejected an application filed by defendants no.1 and 2 seeking judicial notice that defendant no.3 was colluding with plaintiffs to prolong proceedings in this partition suit filed in 2017. The court held that under Order XII of the Code of Civil Procedure, defendants are statutorily permitted to support a plaintiff's claim in civil suits, and therefore defendant no.3's conduct did not violate legal provisions. The application was rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In *Kaushabai Tupe v. Shankar Tambe* (RCS 162/2023), the Civil Court at Sinnar rejected an application filed by defendants no.1 and 2 seeking judicial notice that defendant no.3 was colluding with plaintiffs to prolong proceedings in this partition suit filed in 2017. The court held that under Order XII of the Code of Civil Procedure, defendants are statutorily permitted to support a plaintiff's claim in civil suits, and therefore defendant no.3's conduct did not violate legal provisions. The application was rejected with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts