State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik vs Labpritsing Gurudayal Advocate - Thakare Vivek U — 238/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160003592020
Filing Number
327/2020
Filing Date
04-Mar-2020
Registration No
238/2020
Registration Date
04-Mar-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik
Adv. Mirza Aijaz J. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Labpritsing Gurudayal Advocate - Thakare Vivek U
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State Excise Flying Squad Satana v. Labpritsing Gurudayal (Case 238/2020) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Labpritsing Gurudayal Singh of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquor (40 bottles of Indian-made foreign liquor worth ₹2,080) was recovered from the accused's possession. The prosecution produced only one witness and provided insufficient corroborating evidence, leaving critical facts—particularly whether the seized liquor genuinely belonged to the accused—unproven beyond doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
27-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
12-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
11-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
06-May-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
24-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
20-Oct-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
14-Jul-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
20-Feb-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
02-Dec-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
12-Sep-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
26-Jul-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
13-May-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
08-Apr-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
25-Mar-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
28-Jan-2022
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
08-Dec-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
26-Oct-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
27-Aug-2021
Evidence Part Heard
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
29-May-2021
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
26-Mar-2021
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
08-Feb-2021
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
29-Oct-2020
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
25-Aug-2020
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
15-Jun-2020
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
15-May-2020
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
02-May-2020
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
04-Mar-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 238/2020
Case Summary: State Excise Flying Squad Satana v. Labpritsing Gurudayal (Case 238/2020) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Labpritsing Gurudayal Singh of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquor (40 bottles of Indian-made foreign liquor worth ₹2,080) was recovered from the accused's possession. The prosecution produced only one witness and provided insufficient corroborating evidence, leaving critical facts—particularly whether the seized liquor genuinely belonged to the accused—unproven beyond doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts