Shivaji Karbhari Navale vs Pandharinath Bhika Navale Advocate - Lokhande Bharatbhushan L. — 14/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS160001312024
e-Filing Number
31-01-2024
Filing Number
15/2024
Filing Date
03-Feb-2024
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
03-Feb-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
2-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shivaji Karbhari Navale
Adv. Bharat Thakare
-
2.Vilas Karbhari Navale
Adv. Bharat Thakare
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pandharinath Bhika Navale Advocate - Lokhande Bharatbhushan L.
-
2.Dhanraj Bhika Navale
-
3.Dnyaneshvar Bhika Navale
-
4.Bharat Bhika Navale
-
5.Shravan Bhika Navale
-
6.Sushilabai Bhika Navale
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
28-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
13-Sep-2024
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: 14/2024 Outcome: The petition filed by Shivaji Karbhari Navale and Vilas Karbhari Navale is ALLOWED. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioners' possession, management, and enjoyment of the disputed agricultural property (Survey No. 731/1 and 731/2). Key Finding: The court determined that the petitioners have established prior and continuous possession of the agricultural land through revenue records (satbara/land revenue documents) dating from 1976-2019, and that a 1978 sale deed relied upon by respondents does not extinguish the petitioners' established ownership rights to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
23-Aug-2024
Order on Exh
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
16-Aug-2024
Order on Exh
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
03-Aug-2024
Order on Exh
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
11-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
02-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
11-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
07-May-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-May-2024
Compliance
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
23-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
04-Mar-2024
W.S. and Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
08-Feb-2024
W.S. and Say
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
03-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 14/2024
Case Summary: 14/2024 Outcome: The petition filed by Shivaji Karbhari Navale and Vilas Karbhari Navale is ALLOWED. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioners' possession, management, and enjoyment of the disputed agricultural property (Survey No. 731/1 and 731/2). Key Finding: The court determined that the petitioners have established prior and continuous possession of the agricultural land through revenue records (satbara/land revenue documents) dating from 1976-2019, and that a 1978 sale deed relied upon by respondents does not extinguish the petitioners' established ownership rights to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts