ANANDA EKNATH KSHIRSAGAR vs SUBHADRABAI EKNATH KSHIRSAGAR — 83/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,22. Disposed: Contested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS110007122026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

380/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad

Judge

1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANANDA EKNATH KSHIRSAGAR

    Adv. Pravin Ramdas Kshirsagar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBHADRABAI EKNATH KSHIRSAGAR

  2. 2.SADANAND EKNATH KSHIRSAGAR

  3. 3.VAISHALI WALMIK BHALERAO

  4. 4.SACHIN KIRAN PATIL

  5. 5.NILESH KIRAN USHIRPATIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary The Lok Adalat recorded a compromise between Ananda Kshirsagar and Subhadrabai Kshirsagar regarding ownership declaration and injunction of suit property. The court approved the compromise only to the extent of their shareholding divisions shown in the 7/12 land records (Anewari), as the compromise could not affect specific possession claims without consent from other co-sharers who also hold interests in the same property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 83/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Lok Adalat recorded a compromise between Ananda Kshirsagar and Subhadrabai Kshirsagar regarding ownership declaration and injunction of suit property. The court approved the compromise only to the extent of their shareholding divisions shown in the 7/12 land records (Anewari), as the compromise could not affect specific possession claims without consent from other co-sharers who also hold interests in the same property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case